手机扫码接着看

sitandgopokerstrategy| Passenger Association: Domestic retail penetration rate of new energy vehicles in April was 43.7%

Author:editor|Category:Lifestyle

Newsletter summary

[ride federationSitandgopokerstrategyApril domestic retail penetration rate of new energy vehicles 43Sitandgopokerstrategy.7%] according to the official account of the Federation of passengers, the domestic retail penetration rate of new energy vehicles in April is 43. 7%.Sitandgopokerstrategy.7%, 32% higher than the same period last yearSitandgopokerstrategyThe permeability increased by 11.7 percentage points. In April, the penetration rate of new energy vehicles in independent brands was 66.8%.

sitandgopokerstrategy| Passenger Association: Domestic retail penetration rate of new energy vehicles in April was 43.7%

Text of news flash

[Federation of passengers: domestic retail penetration rate of new energy vehicles in April 43.7%] according to the official account of the Securities Times, the domestic retail penetration rate of new energy vehicles in April was 43.7%, an increase of 11.7 percentage points over the 32% penetration rate in the same period last year. In April, the penetration rate of new energy vehicles in independent brands was 66.8%; that of luxury cars was 22.6%; and that of new energy vehicles in mainstream joint venture brands was only 7.5%. In terms of monthly domestic retail share, the retail share of mainstream independent brands of new energy vehicles in April was 64%, up 2.0% from the same period last year; the share of joint venture brand new energy vehicles was 4.3%, down 0.8% from the same period last year; the share of new power was 11.8%, up 0.5% from the same period last year; Tesla's share was 4%, down 2.6% from the same period last year. Proofread: Zhu Tian Ting

10 05

2024-05-10 16:27:44

浏览15
Back to
Category
Back to
Homepage
jeopardyapril292022| China Mobile's intraday changes rose rapidly by 5.03% in the afternoon baccaratcrystalball| Jingdong's 30 billion yuan fraud case was prosecuted again? Judgment of the first instance: Jingdong has no liability for compensation